Posts

Lasers

Image
(Andrew here.)  In research, it often happens that people rediscover results lost to the sands of time, which always makes me wonder what gemstones have been lost and are waiting to be rediscovered. It also means that a lot of surprising things can be learned from reading old papers. Today I'm going to present a fun curiosity that I saw on Mathologer (luckily somebody did the 'reading old papers' bit for me and spared me having to decipher old French) just because I think it ought to be better known. We'll then see where it takes us. In 1867 an Austrian military engineer by the name of M. E. Lill published the following method of finding real roots of polynomial equations:  Let $p(x)= a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \cdots a_0$ be a polynomial with real coefficients. Starting at the origin $O$ in the coordinate plane, face the direction of the positive $x-$axis. Walk the signed distance $a_n$ (this means that if $a_n$ is negative then walk backwards) and turn $90$ degrees cou...

Two similar functional inequalities

Image
(This is Glen.) I was sorting through my stuff and found a piece of paper from when I tried last year's NTST problems, which I presumably saved because I thought I might eventually want to write a post about it. So here I am, writing a post so I can safely dump this piece of paper into my recycling bin. One functional inequality Here's the relevant problem: ( ISL 2023 A4 )  Let $\mathbb R_{>0}$ be the set of positive real numbers. Determine all functions $f \colon \mathbb R_{>0} \to \mathbb R_{>0}$ such that \[x \left(f(x) + f(y)\right) \geqslant \left(f(f(x)) + y\right) f(y)\] for every $x, y \in \mathbb R_{>0}$. This was NTST 2024 Day 1 Q2, by the way. To avoid spoilers, I'm going to put a very crudely censored version of my working, and then reveal each bit one by one, in the order that I think I wrote everything in. Here we go: Anyway, let's begin. Rectangle #1 Yay, it's the problem statement! Rectangle #2 Here, I tried some simple substitutions. The...

2024: Year in Review

Sometimes, we forget how far we’ve come. This blog is now a little more than a year old! We’ve done well to keep up our weekly publishing streak, with 52 posts this year (and 17 more in the tail of 2023). Let’s celebrate the turn of the year with a consolidation of our writings.  Algebra Choo Ray (8) broke down Vieta Jumping, showing us that beyond identifying the key idea, it was also important to double down on the analysis, and draw connections between features of the problem and of the solution. Wee Kean (14) gave a concise introduction to linear algebra, and explained a geometric (Combi-Nullstellensatz-flavoured) application via dimension counting of a space of polynomials.  Dylan (39) showcased ISL 2023 A7, exposing the geometry hidden behind a discrete averaging of the square root function. Gabriel (46) explained his approach towards a piecewise inequality problem: investigating small cases motivated an induction proof, with terms grouped by size. Drew (35) demonstrat...

Putnam 2024 Testsolve

(David here!) Putnam 2024 was released recently, so I decided to try a bunch of the problems while on the plane ride from NYC to Chicago. (A3) Let $T$ be a (uniformly) random bijection $$ T: \{1,\,2,\,3\}\times\{1,\,2,\,\ldots,\,2024\}\to\{1,\,2,\,\ldots,\,6072\} $$ conditioned on $T$ being increasing in both arguments. Does there exist indices $(a,b)$ and $(c,d)$ such that $$1/3 \le P(T(a,b)\lt T(c,d)) \le 2/3?$$ I took some liberties with reformulating it probabilistically here. My initial reaction was that this was probably true. My first idea was that if $(a,b) \lneq (c,d)$, then the probability is 0, and flipped around it is 1. So maybe we can take some intermediate sequence of indices that slowly switches them? Didn't get very far with this. Well, thinking slightly meta, the problem can't possibly be that hard - there is no way we're figuring out exactly how many $T$ satisfy $T(a,b) \lt T(c,d)$, so maybe we should be looking for bijections (or partial bijecti...

Inversions and Möbius transformations

Image
 (This is Glen.) At some point, Ker Yang wrote a post on Reim's theorem, which he used to solve two past year IMO problems. I remember commenting to him that I had solved neither of them with Reim (and no, I did not bash them). Later on, I tried reconstructing my solution to IMO 2017/4, and I noticed something interesting that made me find another (slightly weird) solution that (I think) isn't on AoPS. So that's what I'll be writing about today. First, the problem: ( IMO 2017/4 ) Let $R$ and $S$ be different points on a circle $\Omega$ such that $RS$ is not a diameter. Let $\ell$ be the tangent line to $\Omega$ at $R$. Point $T$ is such that $S$ is the midpoint of the line segment $RT$. Point $J$ is chosen on the shorter arc $RS$ of $\Omega$ so that the circumcircle $\Gamma$ of triangle $JST$ intersects $\ell$ at two distinct points. Let $A$ be the common point of $\Gamma$ and $\ell$ that is closer to $R$. Line $AJ$ meets $\Omega$ again at $K$. Prove that the line $KT$...

The onion constant is not 0.557

Image
(This is Yan Sheng.) In my mind, J. Kenji López-Alt is the greatest nerdsniper chef: he has made claims about cooking methods and techniques, based on experimental evidence, which have become the inspiration for later theoretical research. For instance, on the subject of grilling meat , he writes that "...flipping steak repeatedly during cooking can result in a cooking time about 30% faster than flipping only once"; this was confirmed by a model of Thiffeault (2022) (here are some slides from a talk ). Today's post, however, is about onions: Question : What is the optimal way to cut an onion such that the size variation among the diced pieces is minimised? After removing the ends and halving the onion, we can view it as approximately a half-cylinder with concentric layers. This reduces the dimension of the problem, so now we're cutting concentric semicircles: (In the following diagrams, I'm viewing the arcs themselves as the layers, and not the spaces bet...